|
Post by Nemo on Nov 4, 2012 20:19:48 GMT -5
I heard about the SW thing.. honestly it kinda.. miffs me? XD cause like, the 3rd episode was supposed to be.. THE END. Done. Caprende. No more.
But wait another Roger Rabbit?? Since when o.o
|
|
|
Post by Patchy on Nov 4, 2012 22:58:29 GMT -5
a while ago.
also why in the world do they keep making paranormal movies? there's going to be a 5th one out!
|
|
|
Post by Mo on Nov 4, 2012 23:56:46 GMT -5
I knowww right -.-"
At this point it's pretty much "White People Who Set Up Cameras Instead of Leaving the Damn House XXVII"
|
|
|
Post by Nemo on Nov 7, 2012 20:48:45 GMT -5
Wait really a 5th one?
I found the 4th one online.. and it was just HORRIBLE. Simply put nothing scary happened until the last 10 minutes of the movie -.- at least the 3rd one had scary stuff throughout the film.
And lol Mo at your quotation title.
|
|
|
Post by Patchy on Nov 8, 2012 0:16:49 GMT -5
that is what i am going to call my next movie. XD
|
|
|
Post by Patchy on Sept 11, 2013 1:28:57 GMT -5
Haven't had to use this thread for awhile. But can I just ask, why does there need to be Rio 2 movie. I don't really care that much to know about Blue's kids. I mean i did love the first movie but it ended so well that the sequel is just going to make me hate it.
Speaking of sequels why in the world does Finding Nemo need a sequel! At all! And why is it going to be Finding Dory! Just what the heck were they thinking?! What is going to happen? Oh maybe i don't know the same thing as finding Nemo!
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Sept 11, 2013 2:16:09 GMT -5
I dunno, so far Pixar's managed to achieve originality in all their sequels, so I don't imagine it'll be too similar. Besides, as 'Finding Dory' it has got to be more original than if it was called 'Finding Nemo 2', which would just underscore how utterly shit a parent Marlin would have to be to lose Nemo twice
|
|
|
Post by Paws on Sept 11, 2013 15:26:07 GMT -5
I remember Ellen DeGeneres mentioning that "Finding Dory" is going to be more about Dory finding her family, rather than Nemo on the loose again. xD
|
|
|
Post by Patchy on Sept 11, 2013 21:03:53 GMT -5
i still think that they don't need it but that's just me.
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Sept 12, 2013 14:29:42 GMT -5
Oh look, according to tumblr there's apparently going to be a new Harry Potter movie based on - wait for it - Harry's school textbook.
Whut.
I don't get it.
|
|
|
Post by Phantom on Sept 12, 2013 22:09:12 GMT -5
I think it's actually supposed to be a spinoff focusing on the author of the textbook in question. New characters, new setting... I think it could be pretty interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Sept 13, 2013 1:27:51 GMT -5
I suppose. Yeah, you're right. I guess I'm just fed up of seeing the excessive hype over it all over my dashboard when the idea just doesn't excite me the way it apparently does everyone else.
I guess that's the disadvantage of joining the fandom when I did; I just can't understand this sort of hype over something new, since the current movies all already existed by the time I became part of it. Maybe I'm just not a proper fan at all. I dunno.
|
|
|
Post by Nemo on Sept 13, 2013 10:41:35 GMT -5
@partner: There's no such thing as a "proper fan" that's just silly! We're all fans <3 And I don't understand the hype either, it's all over my dash to x.x
|
|
|
Post by Patchy on Oct 7, 2014 15:39:17 GMT -5
so old thread becoming alive
Why are you making a live action Dumbo movie? It don't need to be.
also, Sonic the hedgehog movie! Alright let's go! Oh but wait, its going to be like the smurfs! F...Fan freaking tastic
|
|
|
Post by Phantom on Oct 7, 2014 16:10:09 GMT -5
There also doesn't need to be a live action Jungle Book, live action Cinderella, or an Enchanted 2. But they're all happening in the future. :U
|
|