|
Post by Patchy on May 1, 2012 20:42:44 GMT -5
Hiccup X Wilbur- Just...what? What? What the heck is this? i have seen vids on this couple. It is weird, it is worse than weird, and while i can see them being friends, i can see nothing more than that!
Wilbur X Violet- HATE THIS SHIP!! Why does everyone like it?! It's pretty much the same as any other ship, cocky boy meets shy girl, they fall in love. Whoppedeedo. But its worse is that i doubt Violet would be very nice to Wilbur due to the fact he acts kind of like her brother.
|
|
|
Post by Kitexa on May 1, 2012 22:22:12 GMT -5
Chrysalis/Discord.
I REALLLLLLY don't like this ship. At ALL. I love Discord, but the only ship I would even consider him with is Celestia and even then, my headcanon for Discord is different than most and therefore I don't have him with anyone.
And I don't like Chrysalis hardly at all.
|
|
|
Post by Mo on May 15, 2012 17:22:01 GMT -5
Soren x Otulissa, from the Owls of Ga'Hoole movie. Seriously, movie, WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?! Otulissa was a pompous ass-kisser that everyone thought was annoying when she was first introduced in the books, even Soren was irked by her. She didn't become tolerable to her peers until the Siege when she took a level in Badass. Of all the things this movie screwed up (which was a lot), this was probably one of the things that pissed me off most, along with the fact that Kludd & Metalbeak were seperated characters and Metalbeak was a Sooty Owl, the lowest of the low among the Pure Ones in the books. It was pretty minor, granted, but once I caught on that they WERE actually flirting with eachother after they met, my reaction was preeeeetty much this:
C'mon movie. You could have doen so much better. You could have made Soren x Gyflie at least PARTIALLY CANON!!!! D'X *shot* Sorry... SxG is my GoG OTP ^^" I would have loved if they made it the canon couple in the movie.
|
|
|
Post by Namacub95 on May 15, 2012 17:40:12 GMT -5
WHAT IS THIS? Thor/Loki?
I think we need more Nostalgia Critic and his no projecting in here!
|
|
|
Post by Patchy on May 15, 2012 23:18:47 GMT -5
Ash X Any pokemon-This! This shouldn't even exsist! how can people ship Ash with pokemon! I don't care if they can have human forms! it's sick, its gross. Pokemon belong with pokemon, oh but Latias as a human is so cute with ash. BS!! BS!! No one, especially Ash should be with a pokemon. That's taking "I want to catch them all and be the pokemon master" to a sick and twisted level.
Gah, some people
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Jun 9, 2012 15:54:10 GMT -5
LEBECCA. Just... ugh. Can't see what I ever liked about that pairing, it just... sucks so much.
|
|
|
Post by Mo on Jun 9, 2012 16:03:24 GMT -5
I agree with Partner. I don't like it at all either :/ It's not very appealing to me. Their designs go well together, I'll admit, but not much else fits...
...don't kill me please XD;;
|
|
|
Post by Kitexa on Jun 10, 2012 8:55:29 GMT -5
XD;; while I respect your opinions, none of the other pairings available to Becca make any sense in terms of personality, with the exception of Patch. Penny does too but I consider that a crack ship. Also Penny is asexual in my world but that's just me.
Anyway...
Steve/Tony and ClinTasha.
I don't understand the first one at ALL and hate that it's so damn popular. While Tony may be his own sexuality, Steve is your cookie cutter 40s man and wouldn't dream of swinging that way. Steve/Bruce makes a lot more sense, and I'm not just saying that because I prefer them. (Actually I'm thinking of doing Pepper/Tony/Bruce but not sure...). ANYWAY. yeah. I hate Steve/Tony.
ClinTasha...it's so BORING. I mean it was cute at first but Luisa, you were right: it's kind of cliche. And so typical. I mean, that one scene with them was cute but compared to other possible ships (except TonyTasha: still don't see that) it's bland.
Obviously Loki/Tasha is my preferred ship, but there are others i would ship over ClinTasha: Steve/Tasha, or heck, Bruce/Tasha. I just don't like her with Clint. At all.
|
|
|
Post by Mo on Jun 10, 2012 10:09:38 GMT -5
I can agree with you on that point Tex. None of the boys really work with her personality. Patchbecca is meh in my opinion though (cute but not much to offer), so I ship her pretty much exclusively with Penny because no other boy really works Have been thinking Tribecca could POSSIBLY work out but I know that pairing died a while ago sooooo... XD;; Probably just me though. I hate Soren x whoever the hell his mate is after The Burning. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE GYFLIE DAMMIT LASKY ;; I hate AngelxSteele, too. I've seen crossover AMV's for them on YouTube and it just... no. Steele is so much like Buster that Angel wouldn't even bother with him, in fact I'm pretty sure she'd hate hits guts :I But people on YouTube disregard canon personalities and ship stuff because it looks good, so I'll just let it slide. Let them continue being n00b shippers
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Jun 10, 2012 13:45:14 GMT -5
Whaaaat Pennbecca isn't a crack ship, it's serious! XD;;;;;;;
Honestly, though, I don't think Lebecca makes any more sense than any of the other het pairings for her. It's just like James Potter/Lily Evans in canine form, and I never thought that pairing made much decent sense either... I do agree that Patchecca is the only one that really could make logical sense, but it's just so dull that it has no real value as a pairing.
|
|
|
Post by Kitexa on Jun 10, 2012 14:33:37 GMT -5
Aww, I Think Patchecca is cute. ...then again, I mostly look at it through "Dearly Beloved' eyes in which case it's...different XD;; For me, ALL of Becca's ships, including Pennbecca, work on DWoW. To a degree. Canonically, however...I just...can't ship her with anyone outside of Lucky. I just can't. But then, I don't wear a "Lucky is forever a jerk and will never grow up and mature and Rebecca is so sweet and amazing and isn't flawed herself" sunglasses >>;
Sorry...that was mean. But...just how I feel most people treat them. Course, I do understand the James/Lily dynamic. You'd be surprised at what attracts a girl to a guy. We don't ALL like the gentlemen who fawn over us and call us sweet/wait on us hand and foot.
|
|
|
Post by Mo on Jun 10, 2012 14:52:45 GMT -5
That... was kind of mean, there Tex. I don't think Lucky isn't ever going to mature or find himself humbled, nor do I think Rebecca is perfect. I just don't think they work for eachother, nor can they fix eachother's problems. I fail to see them working out as a couple but you are free to disagree. I'm not trying to sound biased but just because I don't like Lebecca doesn't mean I hold Rebecca on a pedestal or think Lucky is the scum of the earth. I'm just not fond of it. And that is all I shall say on the matter for the time being.
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Jun 10, 2012 15:02:31 GMT -5
Oh, thanks a lot. You have basically just told me that anyone who doesn't support Lebecca is a biased idiot. So good to know you think so highly of other people's opinions...
|
|
|
Post by Kitexa on Jun 10, 2012 15:27:42 GMT -5
Yeah...that was mean.
Sorry. Woke up from a nap, PMSing...
I've just grown this overall dislike of Rebecca and all these stereotypes.
And I was not implying you guys were idiots. Only that it has seemed to me that people dislike it because they dislike Lucky and do favor Becca over him. Bah. I don't know what I'm saying anymore.
Sorry Mo, Angel. That was out of line.
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Jun 10, 2012 15:49:26 GMT -5
*relief* You have no idea how relieved I am that you didn't get mad at me for saying that, so thank-you ^^ Sorry if I seemed rude as well
|
|